The plaintiff says she had to drive home after the office partybecause the promised transportation wasn’t there. The defendantclaims the plaintiff is responsible for drinking too much, stayingtoo late, and choosing to drive home drunk. The plaintiff crashedher car and was charged with DUI.
Was the injury “proximately caused” by the employer’snegligence? Was it a foreseeable result of the employer’s act oromission? Yes or No? Please explain.
Was the Plaintiff’s knowledge of the danger [of drivingwhile intoxicated] an intervening case of her injuries? Yes or No?Please explain.
