The plaintiff says she had to drive home after the office party because the promised transportation...

60.1K

Verified Solution

Question

General Management

The plaintiff says she had to drive home after the office partybecause the promised transportation wasn’t there. The defendantclaims the plaintiff is responsible for drinking too much, stayingtoo late, and choosing to drive home drunk. The plaintiff crashedher car and was charged with DUI.
Was the injury “proximately caused” by the employer’snegligence? Was it a foreseeable result of the employer’s act oromission? Yes or No? Please explain.
Was the Plaintiff’s knowledge of the danger [of drivingwhile intoxicated] an intervening case of her injuries? Yes or No?Please explain.

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

3.8 Ratings (594 Votes)

Yes the injury was proximately caused by the employers negligence As the plaintiff was returning home after the office party the employer had the duty to ensure that the plaintiff reaches home safely But the employer breached the duty by allowing the plaintiff to drive home See Answer

Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:

Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!

Become a Member