Please provide proofs for parts i.)-iii.) (i) Refer to the sequence in 1(ii). Show that with...

50.1K

Verified Solution

Question

Advance Math

Please provide proofs for parts i.)-iii.)

(i) Refer to the sequence in 1(ii). Show that with respect tothe supremum norm on ?[0,1] this is a bounded sequence that has noconvergent subsequence. (hint: What is the value of ‖?? − ??‖∞ if ?≠ ??)

(ii) Refer to the sequence in 1(v). Show that this is a boundedsequence with respect to the 1-norm on ?[0,1] that has noconvergent subsequence.

(iii) Let ℎ?(?) = sin??. Show that with respect to the 2-norm?[0,2?], (ℎ?) is a bounded sequence that has no convergentsubsequence. (This exercise shows that the Bolzano-WeierstrassTheorem does not generalise to ?[?,?] with any of the 3 “natural”norms on ?[?,?])

Note: sequences from 1ii.) and 1v.) are pointwise functions andare defined respectively below:

1ii.) For ? ≥ 2, define the function ?? on [0,1] by: ??(?) =(??, if 0 ≤ ? ≤ 1/?)

(2-??, if 1/?< ? ≤ 2/n)

(0, if 2/?< ? ≤ 1)

1v.) Hn=n?? (and fn is defined as above)

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert
3.6 Ratings (406 Votes)
    See Answer
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:
  • Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
  • Zin AI - 3 Million Words
  • 10 Dall-E 3 Images
  • 20 Plot Generations
  • Conversation with Dialogue Memory
  • No Ads, Ever!
  • Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
Become a Member

Other questions asked by students