With that format in the picture.

Doiron v. Devon Capital Corp. The plaintiffs wanted some short-term investments and turned to Jake, who had looked after their pension fund and insurance matters as a representative of Manulife. He persuaded them to invest in Devon Inc., calling the corporation "a no-risk investment." This proved to be bad advice and the plaintiffs lost all of their funds. from Jake, who had become bankrupt. The plaintiffs They unsuccessfully sought com then wanted compensation from Manulife. It was clear that the plaintiffs thought Jake was an employee of Manulife and that the Devon investment was one of Manulife's products, which it was not Question: make any difference to your answer to know that even though Jake was required to work for Manulife exclusively, Manulife had taken pains to set out in their contract that Jake was not an employee, but was an independent contractor? What if you were told that Jake' offices were located in the Manulife Building, that his calls were directed through the Manulife operator, and that when asked he was encouraged to present himself as a Manulife representative? Case Format. Caption: Plaintiff v Defendant Cause of Action: Legal Issues and Rules: This is where the case is built. The more legal issues you can add the better. Build a case for both the plaintiff and defendant if possible.. Plaintiff perspective: Defendant perspective: Ruling and Reason: The defendant is laibleot liable because. Doiron v. Devon Capital Corp. The plaintiffs wanted some short-term investments and turned to Jake, who had looked after their pension fund and insurance matters as a representative of Manulife. He persuaded them to invest in Devon Inc., calling the corporation "a no-risk investment." This proved to be bad advice and the plaintiffs lost all of their funds. from Jake, who had become bankrupt. The plaintiffs They unsuccessfully sought com then wanted compensation from Manulife. It was clear that the plaintiffs thought Jake was an employee of Manulife and that the Devon investment was one of Manulife's products, which it was not Question: make any difference to your answer to know that even though Jake was required to work for Manulife exclusively, Manulife had taken pains to set out in their contract that Jake was not an employee, but was an independent contractor? What if you were told that Jake' offices were located in the Manulife Building, that his calls were directed through the Manulife operator, and that when asked he was encouraged to present himself as a Manulife representative? Case Format. Caption: Plaintiff v Defendant Cause of Action: Legal Issues and Rules: This is where the case is built. The more legal issues you can add the better. Build a case for both the plaintiff and defendant if possible.. Plaintiff perspective: Defendant perspective: Ruling and Reason: The defendant is laibleot liable because