Transcribed Image Text
When preparing capital budgeting analysis for a new project,Chris Johnson, a chief financial officer at BT Industries, faced adilemma. The project involved a production of new type of shippingcontainers, which were significantly more durable and had aconsiderably longer useful life compared to conventional containersused in the industry. The year was 2009, and the equipmentnecessary for producing the containers was being sold for $750K.Each year, this cost is expected to increase by 30%. The usefullife of the equipment and the project is 6 years. Mr. Johnsonestimated that during a recovery year, the project will generatenet cash flows of $500K per year, while during a recessionary year,the project will lose money, with an expected net cash flow of$-100K per year. Because the economy suffered a significant declinejust a year prior, there was uncertainty about the economy ingeneral, and, very much affected by the economy, the demand forshipping and containers. Market analysts predicted that 2010provide certain information about the likelihood of recovery. Atthis point, in 2009, the likelihood of 2010 being a recovery yearis estimated at 45% and the likelihood of 2010 being a recessionyear is estimated at 55%. If 2010 is a recovery year, thelikelihood that recovery continues in 2011 and all subsequent yearsis 80%, and the likelihood of these subsequent years beingrecessionary years is 20%. If recession continues in 2010, thelikelihood that 2011 and all subsequent years will be recoveryyears is 20%, and the likelihood of these subsequent years beingrecessionary is 80%. In 2011, the market gets resolved, andeveryone will know the state of the economy for the foreseeablefuture with certainty. Since he has not dealt with uncertaintyregarding the future state of the economy before, Mr. Johnson isbewildered and asks your help in determining the course of actionregarding this opportunity. In particular, should the firm buy theequipment in 2009, 2010, or not buy at all? Mr. Johnson hasestimated that the WACC for the company in certain times has been10%. Assume that the project has no tax implications, i.e. the taxrate of 0%. Also assume that the firm can shut down the project anytime at a one-time cost of $50K. a) What is the NPV of investing into the machine in 2009?__________________ b) What is the NPV (in year 2009) of delayingthe investment until 2010? __________________ c) What is the NPV(in year 2009) of delaying the investment until 2011?__________________ d) What strategy with respect to this investmentshould the firm follow? In other words, when should the firminvest? Explain your answer.
Other questions asked by students
A 5 metre long wire is fixed to the ceiling A weight of 10 kg...
At t 0 a sound source S and observers 0 O2 are placed as shown...
126 The relative density of the material of a body is the ratio of its...
The Allowance for Bad Debts account has a credit balance of $2,000 before the adjusting...