What is a good response/explanation to the following: Would yoube agree/disagree to this research?
How does the research conducted by Brene Brown differ fromquantitative research?
Brene Brown's research was conducted to retrieve in-depthinformation from participants while quantitative research lacks thein-depth factor. She also used the information gathered and madeinterpretations and found commonalities and differences thanquantitative research could consider extraneous variables orlacking numerical value. Brene Browns used all the collectedinterviews to explore common reoccurring factors with great detail.These details of life struggles and resilience did not holdstatistical (numerical) data but provided valuable information fromreal populations willing to share their story.
What qualitative techniques does she use?
Brene Browns used understandability and comparability to engagein research that held human life experiences with value. During herassessment of written and verbal interviews, she was active in theconversation for how shame is related to our fear of disconnection.She analyzed the information and found outliers and focused on thecomparing qualities they shared. She held on to the data forseveral years before creating a theory about what it all means.
What are some advantages and disadvantages to Brown'sapproach?
Some disadvantages in Brown’s approach are that she toostruggled with vulnerability and it did not feel like her to openlyaccept the emotions that can arise from vulnerability. I believethis bias made it difficult to initially grasp the value ofvulnerability. An advantage to her approach is she gathersthousands of reports/interviews that helped guide her to narrow herthoughts on why things were happening and why embracingauthenticity and feeling worthiness for love and belonging were soimportant. The depth of the stories provided knowledge of real-lifeexperiences with a thorough understanding of how the details relateand differ from each other.
