Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random...

70.2K

Verified Solution

Question

Basic Math

Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied forproduction of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annualwheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was asfollows.

7.176.336.547.177.317.18
7.065.796.245.916.14

Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the samplevariance is s2 ? 0.325.

Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the followingannual wheat production (in pounds).

6.407.316.757.527.225.585.475.86

Use a calculator to verify that the sample variance for thisplot is s2 ? 0.658.

Test the claim that there is a difference (either way) in thepopulation variance of wheat straw production for these two plots.Use a 5% level of signifcance.

(a) What is the level of significance?

State the null and alternate hypotheses.

Ho: ?12 =?22; H1:?12 >?22

Ho: ?12 >?22; H1:?12 =?22     

Ho: ?22 =?12; H1:?22 >?12

Ho: ?12 =?22; H1:?12 ??22



(b) Find the value of the sample F statistic. (Use 2decimal places.)


What are the degrees of freedom?

dfN
dfD

What assumptions are you making about the originaldistribution?

The populations follow independent normal distributions.

The populations follow dependent normal distributions. We haverandom samples from eachpopulation.     

The populations follow independent normal distributions. We haverandom samples from each population.

The populations follow independent chi-square distributions. Wehave random samples from each population.


(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample teststatistic. (Use 4 decimal places.)

p-value > 0.2000

.100 < p-value <0.200     

0.050 < p-value < 0.1000

.020 < p-value < 0.0500

.002 < p-value < 0.020

p-value < 0.002


(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject orfail to reject the null hypothesis?

At the ? = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesisand conclude the data are not statistically significant.

At the ? = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesisand conclude the data are statisticallysignificant.     

At the ? = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the nullhypothesis and conclude the data are not statisticallysignificant.

At the ? = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the nullhypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.


(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of theapplication.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidencethat the variance in annual wheat production differs between thetwo plots.

Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence thatthe variance in annual wheat production differs between the twoplots.     

Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence thatthe variance in annual wheat production differs between the twoplots.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficientevidence that the variance in annual wheat production differsbetween the two plots.

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert
3.7 Ratings (613 Votes)
for first sample variances2sumxmean2n13247111032470325 3 decimal place approximation sn x xmean xmean2 1 717 0548 0301 2 633 0292 0085 3 654 0082 0007 4 717 0548 0301 5 731 0688 0474 6 718 0558 0312 7 706 0438 0192 8 579 0832 0692 9 624 0382 0146 10 591 0712 0507 11 614    See Answer
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:
  • Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
  • Zin AI - 3 Million Words
  • 10 Dall-E 3 Images
  • 20 Plot Generations
  • Conversation with Dialogue Memory
  • No Ads, Ever!
  • Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
Become a Member

Other questions asked by students