Traditional finance theory assumes that people make rational decisions to maximize their wealth in the...
50.1K
Verified Solution
Link Copied!
Question
Accounting
Traditional finance theory assumes that people make rational decisions to maximize their wealth in the face of risk and uncertainty. Because money is involved, reason and logic will overcome emotion and psychological biases, it would seem. Is this a good assumption? In reality, the situation might be just the opposite. Emotion might overcome reason when one is making a risky decision involving money. Psychological research has also shown that the brain uses shortcuts to reduce the complexity of analyzing information. These mental shortcuts allow the brain to generate an estimate of an answer before fully digesting all the available information. Two examples of shortcuts are known as representativeness and familiarity. In the context of cross-border M&A, how do you think these psychological biases could affect the end result of a cross-border M&A attempt
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions
Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!
Membership Benefits:
- Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
- Zin AI - 3 Million Words
- 10 Dall-E 3 Images
- 20 Plot Generations
- Conversation with Dialogue Memory
- No Ads, Ever!
- Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
Other questions asked by students
StudyZin's Question Purchase
1 Answer
$0.99
(Save $1 )
One time Pay
- No Ads
- Answer to 1 Question
- Get free Zin AI - 50 Thousand Words per Month
Best
Unlimited
$4.99*
(Save $5 )
Billed Monthly
- No Ads
- Answers to Unlimited Questions
- Get free Zin AI - 3 Million Words per Month
*First month only
Free
$0
- Get this answer for free!
- Sign up now to unlock the answer instantly
You can see the logs in the Dashboard.