70.2K

Verified Solution

Link Copied!

This is a business law case and I the answer of the question and an opinion of why is that ? The case is the 14-6 and the question is the highlight part

For a sample answer to Problem 14-5, go to Appendix E at ext the end of this text. 14-6. Acceptance. New England Precision Grinding, Inc. (NEPG), sells precision medical parts in Massachusetts. CO kit de NEPG agreed to supply Kyphon, Inc., with stylets and nozzles.r NEPG contracted with Simply Surgical, LLC, to obtain the parts from Iscon Surgicals, Ltd. The contract did not mention de sl Kyphon or require Kyphon's acceptance of the parts. Before shipping, Iscon would certify that the parts conformed to NEPG's specifications. On receiving the parts, NEPG would certify that they conformed to Kyphon's specifications. On delivery, Kyphon would also inspect the parts. After about half a dozen transactions, NEPG's payments to Simply Surgi- cal lagged, and the seller refused to make further deliveries. t Sim- ply Surgical, alleging breach of contract. NEPG claimed that Kyphon had rejected some of the parts, which gave NEPG the right not to pay for them. Do the UCC's rules with respect to acceptance support or undercut the parties actions? Discuss. New England Precision Grinding, Inc.v. Simply Surgical, LLC 89 Mass.App.Ct.176, 46 N.E.3d 590 (2016)] (See The Forma- tion of Sales and Lease Contracts.) For a sample answer to Problem 14-5, go to Appendix E at ext the end of this text. 14-6. Acceptance. New England Precision Grinding, Inc. (NEPG), sells precision medical parts in Massachusetts. CO kit de NEPG agreed to supply Kyphon, Inc., with stylets and nozzles.r NEPG contracted with Simply Surgical, LLC, to obtain the parts from Iscon Surgicals, Ltd. The contract did not mention de sl Kyphon or require Kyphon's acceptance of the parts. Before shipping, Iscon would certify that the parts conformed to NEPG's specifications. On receiving the parts, NEPG would certify that they conformed to Kyphon's specifications. On delivery, Kyphon would also inspect the parts. After about half a dozen transactions, NEPG's payments to Simply Surgi- cal lagged, and the seller refused to make further deliveries. t Sim- ply Surgical, alleging breach of contract. NEPG claimed that Kyphon had rejected some of the parts, which gave NEPG the right not to pay for them. Do the UCC's rules with respect to acceptance support or undercut the parties actions? Discuss. New England Precision Grinding, Inc.v. Simply Surgical, LLC 89 Mass.App.Ct.176, 46 N.E.3d 590 (2016)] (See The Forma- tion of Sales and Lease Contracts.)

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

See Answer