Please read the case below and answer in the following format:1) Relevant Law 2) Conclusion - the outcome, and why.
The book for this course is Business Law with UCC application -14th edition
The case is the following one:
The bylaws of Jameson Enterprises, Inc., required a 70percent supermajority to establish a quo rum sufficient to hold ameeting to remove a director from the board. The bylaws also des ig nated a meeting with such a purpose as a special meeting. Theboard consisted of ten direc tors. Six showed up at the meeting. Ofthe four who failed to attend, three were in Europe. The fourth,Weinberger, was not notified of the meeting because he was the oneto be removed. The six directors attending the meeting first votedto change the bylaws to require only 60 percent of the directors toestablish a quorum sufficient to hold a special meeting. The sixdirectors then unanimously voted to remove Weinberger. WhenWeinberger found out about the mee t ing, he objected to the voteand claimed that the entire procedure was void. Was Weinbergercorrect? Explain
