philosophy class Question 110 pts Spooner explicitly says that the Constitution has no authority. True False Flag this Question Question 210 pts Schultz...

60.1K

Verified Solution

Question

Psychology

philosophy class

Question 110 pts

Spooner explicitly says that the Constitution has noauthority.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 210 pts

Schultz cites the writings of the Framers in his article. Hedoes this to support his interpretation of the Constitution andthus his conclusion. This means his citations to those writings areevidence in his argument.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 310 pts

A Textualist says that the meaning of a text is set by theintentions of the author(s)s.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 410 pts

If a smart reader thinks a text should be read a certain way, anOriginalist must think that reading is correct.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 510 pts

If there are statements about the world in the Constitution,then there are propositions in the Constitution.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 610 pts

If Schultz's argument is valid and his premises are true, hisargument is sound.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 710 pts

A textualist is most likely to say that if the Constitution doesnot say something, it does not mean that thing.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 810 pts

An Originalist is most likely to hold that if a certain word isnot in the Constitution, the Constitution says nothing about thatword.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 910 pts

Spooner argues that the Constitution has been useful and it thushas authority over the citizens.

True
False

Flag this Question

Question 1010 pts

The following is a correct application of modus tollens.

1. If the Founders wanted to bind their posterity, they violatedthe rights of their posterity.

2. The Founders did not violate the rights of theirposterity.

3. Thus, the Founders did not want to bind their posterity.

True
False

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert
4.4 Ratings (943 Votes)
Q 110 The answer is TrueAccording to Spoonerthe Constitution has no inherent authority or obligationunless as a contract between man and man Its a no treason contract wherein he argues that the US constitution cannot have a binding effect on anyone be the signers of the document those living at the time of its signing or those who have since lived The only kind of document that has had binding effect is a contract    See Answer
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:
  • Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
  • Zin AI - 3 Million Words
  • 10 Dall-E 3 Images
  • 20 Plot Generations
  • Conversation with Dialogue Memory
  • No Ads, Ever!
  • Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
Become a Member

Other questions asked by students