On February 9, George Jackson and his neighbors, Karen and Steve Devenyn, drafted and signed a...

90.2K

Verified Solution

Question

Finance

On February 9, George Jackson and his neighbors, Karen and SteveDevenyn, drafted and signed a document that purports to convey aseventy-nine acre parcel of land owned by Jackson. By the terms ofthe agreement, Jackson wished to reserve a 1.3-acre portion of theparcel. Although the agreement contained a drawing and dimensionsof the conveyance, it did not contain a specific description of theparcel. Jackson died on May 8th, and his estate refused to honorthe agreement. The Devenyns then filed a petition with the probatecourt to order a conveyance. Based on the parol evidence rule, theestate of Jackson objected to the admission of the witnesses'testimony that they could point out the specific area based onconversations with Jack. Explain whether the oral evidence isadmissible.

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

4.2 Ratings (493 Votes)

See Answer

Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:

Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!

Become a Member

Transcribed Image Text

On February 9, George Jackson and his neighbors, Karen and SteveDevenyn, drafted and signed a document that purports to convey aseventy-nine acre parcel of land owned by Jackson. By the terms ofthe agreement, Jackson wished to reserve a 1.3-acre portion of theparcel. Although the agreement contained a drawing and dimensionsof the conveyance, it did not contain a specific description of theparcel. Jackson died on May 8th, and his estate refused to honorthe agreement. The Devenyns then filed a petition with the probatecourt to order a conveyance. Based on the parol evidence rule, theestate of Jackson objected to the admission of the witnesses'testimony that they could point out the specific area based onconversations with Jack. Explain whether the oral evidence isadmissible.