Nozick offers a Lockeian Theory of property and a reading of theLockeian Proviso in order to justify his model of a minimal state,centered on the protection of a practically unlimited right toprivate property. Evaluate Nozick’s reading of Locke. Is hisaccount of the origin, nature, purpose, and limits of property afaithful reading? Or does it miss or distort aspects of histhought? Be specific in your answer.
