Mill argues that utilitarianism requires us to be strictly impartial. That is to say, my own...

60.1K

Verified Solution

Question

Psychology

Mill argues that utilitarianism requires us to be strictlyimpartial. That is to say, my own happiness and well being do notcount any more than that of anyone else who will be affected by myactions, including complete strangers. But, according to thisstandard of strict impartiality, who elseâ€™s happiness doesnâ€™t countany more than that of a complete stranger? Are all human beings allequally morally worthy, and worthy of equal moral consideration, byanyone? Is it ever right to give preferential treatment to somepeople (say, my children) from a moral perspective? Or, does Millhave it right, and does morality require impartiality, even when itleads to some really difficult choices?

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

4.4 Ratings (830 Votes)

Utilitarianism is a concept that proposes that any action is right if it produces happiness and wrong if it doesnt Although the statement that one should be impartial towards everyone even strangers may be right philosophically but See Answer

Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:

Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!

Become a Member