Melnick built a house for Gintzler, but the foundation was defective. Gintzler agreed to accpet...
70.2K
Verified Solution
Link Copied!
Question
Accounting
Melnick built a house for Gintzler, but the foundation was defective. Gintzler agreed to accpet the foundation if Melnick guranteed to make future repairs caused by the defects. Melnick agreed but later refused to make any repairs. Melnick argued that his promise to make future reparis was unsupported by consideration. Who will win the suti? Is either party acting unethically? Which one, and why?
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions
Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!
Membership Benefits:
- Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
- Zin AI - 3 Million Words
- 10 Dall-E 3 Images
- 20 Plot Generations
- Conversation with Dialogue Memory
- No Ads, Ever!
- Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
Other questions asked by students
StudyZin's Question Purchase
1 Answer
$0.99
(Save $1 )
One time Pay
- No Ads
- Answer to 1 Question
- Get free Zin AI - 50 Thousand Words per Month
Best
Unlimited
$4.99*
(Save $5 )
Billed Monthly
- No Ads
- Answers to Unlimited Questions
- Get free Zin AI - 3 Million Words per Month
*First month only
Free
$0
- Get this answer for free!
- Sign up now to unlock the answer instantly
You can see the logs in the Dashboard.