I really need help as soon as possible thank you

The Basics of Capital Budgeting: NPV Profile NPV Profile A project's NP profile graph intersects the Y-axis at 0 % cost of capital and intersects the X-axis at the project's IRR one another is the crossover rate. The crossaver rate can be found by calculating the IRR If a project has most of its cash flows coming in later years, its NPV will declinesharply if the cost of capital increases; but a project whose cash flows ocome earlier will not be severely penalized by high capital costs. The significance of the crossover rate is that at any cost of capital gruater than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods will provide the same conclusion for evaluating mutually exclusive projects. However, at any cost of capital luss canclusions will conflict. In that situation, the IRR (where NPV 0). The Y-axds Intersection point represents the project's undiscounted NPV. The point at which 2 projects' profiles cross of the differences in the projects' cash flows (Praject Delta). Atep NPV profile indicates that increases in the cost of capital lead to large declines in NPV. than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods method will always provide the correct project acceptance result. Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 11%. 0 1 2 4 Praject A 1,200 600 450 330 300 Project B -1,200 400 330 410 745 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. % What is the significance of this IRR? after this paint when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches It is the alect Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu. -Select NPV Profiles A. NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C NPVS NPV (S) 600- 600 600- S00 500 500 400+ 400 400 300t 300 300 200 200 200 100+ 100+ 100 3 5 10 15 25 30 1D 15 25 30 10 25 30 -100 100 100 Cost of Capical 6k Cost of Capital % Coct o Captal(%) -200t -200 -200 rch A Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 11% 0 1 3 4 Prolect A -1,200 600 450 330 300 330 Project B -1,200 410 400 745 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round interrmediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. what is the significance of this IRR? It is the-salect after this point when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches. -Select Review tequty return Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and 8 by using the following drop dawn menu. crossover rato -Select- interat yld NPV Profiles A NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C ANPV IS NPV S NPV (S 600 600 600 500 S00 S00; 400+ 400 400 300- 300 00 200 200 200 100 1D0 1D0 10 10 15 25 30 15 25 30 10 25 30 -100t -1D0 -1D0 Cost Capital (%) Cost or Capkal (%) Cost Capkal (% -2007 -200 -200 300 -400 300 300 4004 -400 NPV Profiles D INPV IS 600t 500 400- 300 200 100+ Project A 600 -1,200 450 330 300 Project B -1,200 400 330 410 745 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. % What is the significance of this IRR? after this point when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches. It is the -Select- Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu. Select- NPV Profiles A NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C uestions Navigation Menu PV (S NPV (S) NPV (S B 600 600 500; 500 500 400 400 400 300 300 300 200 200 200 100 100 100 15 5 10 15 25 30 5 10 25 30 5 10 25 30 -100 -100 100 Cost of Capital (%) Cost of Capital (%) Cost o Capital (%) -200 -2001 200 -3001 -400 300 -400 300 -400 NPV Profiles D ANPV (S 600 500 400 300 200 100 20 5 10 15 25 30 -100 Cost of Capital (% ) 200 -300 The Basics of Capital Budgeting: NPV Profile NPV Profile A project's NP profile graph intersects the Y-axis at 0 % cost of capital and intersects the X-axis at the project's IRR one another is the crossover rate. The crossaver rate can be found by calculating the IRR If a project has most of its cash flows coming in later years, its NPV will declinesharply if the cost of capital increases; but a project whose cash flows ocome earlier will not be severely penalized by high capital costs. The significance of the crossover rate is that at any cost of capital gruater than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods will provide the same conclusion for evaluating mutually exclusive projects. However, at any cost of capital luss canclusions will conflict. In that situation, the IRR (where NPV 0). The Y-axds Intersection point represents the project's undiscounted NPV. The point at which 2 projects' profiles cross of the differences in the projects' cash flows (Praject Delta). Atep NPV profile indicates that increases in the cost of capital lead to large declines in NPV. than the crossover rate, the NPV and IRR methods method will always provide the correct project acceptance result. Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 11%. 0 1 2 4 Praject A 1,200 600 450 330 300 Project B -1,200 400 330 410 745 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. % What is the significance of this IRR? after this paint when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches It is the alect Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu. -Select NPV Profiles A. NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C NPVS NPV (S) 600- 600 600- S00 500 500 400+ 400 400 300t 300 300 200 200 200 100+ 100+ 100 3 5 10 15 25 30 1D 15 25 30 10 25 30 -100 100 100 Cost of Capical 6k Cost of Capital % Coct o Captal(%) -200t -200 -200 rch A Quantitative Problem: Bellinger Industries is considering two projects for inclusion in its capital budget, and you have been asked to do the analysis. Both projects' after-tax cash flows are shown on the time line below. Depreciation, salvage values, net operating working capital requirements, and tax effects are all included in these cash flows. Both projects have 4-year lives, and they have risk characteristics similar to the firm's average project. Bellinger's WACC is 11% 0 1 3 4 Prolect A -1,200 600 450 330 300 330 Project B -1,200 410 400 745 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round interrmediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. what is the significance of this IRR? It is the-salect after this point when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches. -Select Review tequty return Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and 8 by using the following drop dawn menu. crossover rato -Select- interat yld NPV Profiles A NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C ANPV IS NPV S NPV (S 600 600 600 500 S00 S00; 400+ 400 400 300- 300 00 200 200 200 100 1D0 1D0 10 10 15 25 30 15 25 30 10 25 30 -100t -1D0 -1D0 Cost Capital (%) Cost or Capkal (%) Cost Capkal (% -2007 -200 -200 300 -400 300 300 4004 -400 NPV Profiles D INPV IS 600t 500 400- 300 200 100+ Project A 600 -1,200 450 330 300 Project B -1,200 400 330 410 745 What is Project Delta's IRR? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places. % What is the significance of this IRR? after this point when mutually exclusive projects are considered there is no conflict in project acceptance between the NPV and IRR approaches. It is the -Select- Review the graphs below. Select the graph that correctly represents the correct NPV profile for Projects A and B by using the following drop down menu. Select- NPV Profiles A NPV Profiles B NPV Profiles C uestions Navigation Menu PV (S NPV (S) NPV (S B 600 600 500; 500 500 400 400 400 300 300 300 200 200 200 100 100 100 15 5 10 15 25 30 5 10 25 30 5 10 25 30 -100 -100 100 Cost of Capital (%) Cost of Capital (%) Cost o Capital (%) -200 -2001 200 -3001 -400 300 -400 300 -400 NPV Profiles D ANPV (S 600 500 400 300 200 100 20 5 10 15 25 30 -100 Cost of Capital (% ) 200 -300