I need a case brief for Mclaughlin v. County of Riverside (1991)

70.2K

Verified Solution

Question

Psychology

I need a case brief for Mclaughlin v. County of Riverside(1991)

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

4.0 Ratings (464 Votes)

The parties dispute whether the combined probable cause arraignment procedure is available to allwarrantless ar restees Testimony by Riverside County District Attorney Grover Trask suggests that individuals arrested without warrants for felonies do not receive a probable cause determination until the preliminary hearing which may not occur until 10 days after arraignment 2 App 298299 Before this Court however the County represents that its policy is to provide probable cause determinations at arraignment for all persons arrested without a warrant regardless of the nature of the charges against them Ibid See also Tr of Oral Arg 13 We need not resolve the factual inconsistency here For present purposes we accept the Countys representation In August 1987 Donald Lee McLaughlin filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking injunctive and declaratory relief on behalf of himself and all others See Answer

Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:

Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!

Become a Member