Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrialcomponent parts—the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing incomestatement for the most recent period is shown:
Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement |
Sales | $ | 1,710,000 | |
Cost of goods sold | | 1,213,984 | |
Gross margin | | 496,016 | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 630,000 | |
Net operating loss | $ | (133,984 | ) |
|
Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,300 units of B300 at a price of $20per unit and 12,600 units of T500 at a price of $40 per unit. Thecompany’s traditional cost system allocates manufacturing overheadto products using a plantwide overhead rate and direct labordollars as the allocation base. Additional information relating tothe company’s two product lines is shown below:
| B300 | T500 | Total |
Direct materials | $ | 400,300 | $ | 162,200 | $ | 562,500 |
Direct labor | $ | 120,400 | $ | 42,600 | | 163,000 |
Manufacturing overhead | | | | | | 488,484 |
Cost of goods sold | | | | | $ | 1,213,984 |
|
The company has created an activity-based costing system toevaluate the profitability of its products. Hi-Tek’s ABCimplementation team concluded that $57,000 and $104,000 of thecompany’s advertising expenses could be directly traced to B300 andT500, respectively. The remainder of the selling and administrativeexpenses was organization-sustaining in nature. The ABC team alsodistributed the company’s manufacturing overhead to four activitiesas shown below:
| Manufacturing Overhead | Activity |
Activity Cost Pool (and Activity Measure) | B300 | T500 | Total |
Machining (machine-hours) | $ | 204,484 | | 90,200 | 62,400 | 152,600 |
Setups (setup hours) | | 123,200 | | 78 | 230 | 308 |
Product-sustaining (number of products) | | 100,200 | | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Other (organization-sustaining costs) | | 60,600 | | NA | NA | NA |
Total manufacturing overhead cost | $ | 488,484 | | | | |
|
Required:
1. Compute the product margins for the B300 and T500 under thecompany’s traditional costing system.
2. Compute the product margins for B300 and T500 under theactivity-based costing system.
3. Prepare a quantitative comparison of the traditional andactivity-based cost assignments.