for this problem (after checking my work) the operating cost is incorrect, making my total...

90.2K

Verified Solution

Question

Accounting

for this problem (after checking my work) the operating cost is incorrect, making my total wrong. Which means number 2, 3 and 4 are also incorrect?

imageimageimageimage

Heaps Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Heaps uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $629,300 and will cost $45,530 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $7,660 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings: Water usage $ 67,330 Chemical usage 42,050 Sludge disposal 90,430 Recovered metal sales 45,070 Sampling of discharge 120,460 Total $365,340 The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the company's cost of capital is 12 percent. Year o $ -629,300 Year 1: Operating costs 50,126 Savings 219,204 Depreciation shield 17,980 Total 287,310 Years 2-7: Operating costs 50,126 Savings 219,204 Depreciation shield 35,960 Total 305,290 Year 8: Operating costs $ 50,126 Savings 219,204 Depreciation shield 17,980 Total 305,290 Years 9-10: Operating costs $ 50,126 Savings 219,204 Total $ 269,330 2. What is the payback period? Round your answer to two decimal places. 2.12 years 3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Round intermediate calculations and the final answer to the nearest dollar. $ 813,129 Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $75,120, the sales effect is $60,230 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $308,000. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV? Round payback to two decimal places and round NPV calculation and final answer to the nearest dollar. Payback Decreases by 1.47 years NPV Increases by $ 231,443 Heaps Company produces jewelry that requires electroplating with gold, silver, and other valuable metals. Electroplating uses large amounts of water and chemicals, producing wastewater with a number of toxic residuals. Currently, Heaps uses settlement tanks to remove waste; unfortunately, the approach is inefficient, and much of the toxic residue is left in the water that is discharged into a local river. The amount of toxic discharge exceeds the legal, allowable amounts, and the company is faced with substantial, ongoing environmental fines. The environmental violations are also drawing unfavorable public reaction, and sales are being affected. A lawsuit is also impending, which could prove to be quite costly. Management is now considering the installation of a zero-discharge, closed-loop system to treat the wastewater. The proposed closed-loop system would not only purify the wastewater, but also produce cleaner water than that currently being used, increasing plating quality. The closed-loop system would produce only four pounds of sludge, and the sludge would be virtually pure metal, with significant market value. The system requires an investment of $629,300 and will cost $45,530 in increased annual operation plus an annual purchase of $7,660 of filtration medium. However, management projects the following savings: Water usage $ 67,330 Chemical usage 42,050 Sludge disposal 90,430 Recovered metal sales 45,070 Sampling of discharge 120,460 Total $365,340 The equipment qualifies as a seven-year MACRS asset. Management has decided to use straight-line depreciation for tax purposes, using the required half-year convention. The tax rate is 40 percent. The projected life of the system is 10 years. The hurdle rate is 16 percent for all capital budgeting projects, although the company's cost of capital is 12 percent. Year o $ -629,300 Year 1: Operating costs 50,126 Savings 219,204 Depreciation shield 17,980 Total 287,310 Years 2-7: Operating costs 50,126 Savings 219,204 Depreciation shield 35,960 Total 305,290 Year 8: Operating costs $ 50,126 Savings 219,204 Depreciation shield 17,980 Total 305,290 Years 9-10: Operating costs $ 50,126 Savings 219,204 Total $ 269,330 2. What is the payback period? Round your answer to two decimal places. 2.12 years 3. Calculate the NPV of the closed-loop system. Round intermediate calculations and the final answer to the nearest dollar. $ 813,129 Suppose, for example, that the annual fines being incurred are $75,120, the sales effect is $60,230 per year, the quality effect is not estimable, and cancellation of the lawsuit because of the new system would avoid an expected settlement at the end of Year 3 (including legal fees) of $308,000. Assuming these are all after-tax amounts, what effect would their inclusion have on the payback period? On the NPV? Round payback to two decimal places and round NPV calculation and final answer to the nearest dollar. Payback Decreases by 1.47 years NPV Increases by $ 231,443

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert
Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:
  • Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
  • Zin AI - 3 Million Words
  • 10 Dall-E 3 Images
  • 20 Plot Generations
  • Conversation with Dialogue Memory
  • No Ads, Ever!
  • Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!
Become a Member

Other questions asked by students