Consider the following two-car accident: Two cars of equal mass m collide at an intersection. Driver E was traveling eastward, and driver N, northward. After the collision, the two cars remain joined together and slide, with locked wheels, before coming to rest. Police on the scene measure the length d of the skid marks to be 9 meters. The coefficient of friction between the locked wheels and the road is equal to 0.9.Each driver claims that his speed was less than 14 meters per second (about 31 mph). A third driver, who was traveling closely behind driver E prior to the collision, supports driver E's claim by asserting that driver E's speed could not have been greater than 12 meters per second. Take the following steps to decide whether driver N's statement is consistent with the third driver'scontention.?Part CWrite an expression for the work Wfric done on the cars by friction.Express your answer symbolically in terms of the mass m of a single car, the magnitude of theacceleration due to gravity g, the coefficient of sliding friction, and the distance d through whichthe two-car system slides before coming to rest.View Available Hint(s)Wfric=SubPart DUn =AEOUsing the information given in the problem introduction and assuming that the third driver is telling the truth, determine whether driver N has reported his speed correctly. Specifically, if driver E had been traveling with a speed of exactly 12 meters per second before the collision, what must driver N's speed have been before the collision?SubmitExpress your answer numerically, in meters per second, to the nearest integer. Take g, themagnitude of the acceleration due to gravity, to be 9.81 meters per second per second.View Available Hint(s)