Case 3: Whether or not to keep a company open
You are in charge of a small engineering company that has been largely successful in recent years. Employees are motivated and content and share the goals and values of the organization. There is a trade union, but membership is quite low due to the stable nature of employment.
However, in the last few months your debtors have been delaying their payments. New business has been harder to obtain due to increased competition and recession. This has led to a serious cash flow problem. You feel that in these circumstances it would be difficult to carry on in the same way and are considering selling the business either in its present form or as individual assets. You have asked for advice on the future liquidity of the company from the chief accountant. The workforce naturally wants to see the company stay open or be taken over by another company. They also feel that they should be valued for their loyalty and commitment.
You value the commitment of the workforce and the economy is improving quite quickly, but with the company beginning to amass unpaid bills you need to decide if the company should continue to trade.
Analysis and Recommendation
Using the problem requirements, decision rules, and leadership styles of the Normative Decision Model, indicate which decision style(s) would be most appropriate.
1. What type of problem is it: group or individual?
2. Contingency factors:
Is there a quality requirement?
Does the leader have enough information to make a high-quality decision?
Is the problem clear and staicturcd?
Is employee acceptance of the decision needed for its implementation?
Will subordinates accept the decision if the leader makes it by himself or herself?
Do subordinates share the organization's goals for the problem?
Is there conflict among subordinates (are they cohesive) regarding the problem?
3. W hat are acceptable decision styles? W hy?
4. What are unacceptable decision styles? Why?
