BUSINESS LAW!!! Mary Slough contracted with Castlerock Building Inc., which was owned by Max Nitzer, to remodel...

70.2K

Verified Solution

Question

Finance

BUSINESS LAW!!!
Mary Slough contracted with Castlerock Building Inc., which wasowned by Max Nitzer, to remodel a house. Nitzer estimated the costat $500,000. Eventually, however, Mary paid Nitzer more that $1.3million. Mary sought to be reimbursed but Nitzer could not providean accounting for the project. Specifically, he could not explaindouble and triple charges, nor whether the amount Mary pad hadactually been spent on the house. Meanwhile, Nitzer had commingledpersonal and corporate funds. As for Castlerock, it has issued noshares of stock, and the minutes of the corporate meetings "alllooked the same." Mary sues Castlerock and Nitzer. As the Courtreviewing these facts, would you hold Nitzer personally liable? Whyor Why not?

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

3.9 Ratings (621 Votes)

Yes Nitzer will be held personally liable to explain the cause for such escalated costs as also for reimbursement if any if anything exhorbitant has been charged as it seems costs are doubled tripled without any reason therefor Even though Nitzer had incorporated his entity he has not See Answer

Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:

Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!

Become a Member