Business Case: Contracts Apply It: Contracts Total points: 2/5 Attempts left: 1 if the court finds that no valid contract existed between Brain Train and Natasha because of a failure in the meeting of the minds, what could Natasha argue to still recover damages? Expectation damages X Liquidated damages Natasha had a 5-year-old son, Klaus, who had been diagnosed by his pediatric psychiatrist with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The physician tried multiple different medications and dosages with varying results to help Klaus. Some would help for a while but then stop working some would not help at all. Frustrated after a year of medication trials, Natasha came across an advertisement for a new center called Brain Train that promised to help children with ADHD without the use of medications. It was advertised as a privately owned mental exercise center" that didn't require a physician's referral and did not employ medical staff. Also among the advertising material was the story about the founder, John Gadeaux, who overcame his own ADHD without doctors or prescriptions and how he was bringing his technique to the world, Natasha made an appointment with the center to get more information While there, Natasha met with Mina, the director of the center. Mina provided numerous pamphlets touting the almost 100 percent "cure" rate of their method. She even provided Natasha with what looked like a clinical study conducted by so Independent doctors showing a 100 percent success rate for 10 children completing the program Mina said that they believed ADHD was merely a failure of the brain to balance the primitive reflexes with which we are all born. She discussed how Brain Train would test Klaus for these reflexes at the beginning of the program and again at the end of the 12-week program, and without a doube Natasha would see improvement. Mina also told Natasha that the program consisted of a series of exercises that would be conducted at the center and that Natasha would need to conduct at home. The exercises She is not able to recover damages if there is no contract Restitution if Brain Train and Natasha had executed a written contract which contained a liquidated damages clause for $200 in the event that Brain Train breached and assuming Brain Train admits to a breach, would that cause heeldin.cout2 Business Case: Contracts Apply It: Contracts Total points: 2/5 Attempts left: 1 If Brain Train and Natasha had executed a written contract which contained a liquidated damages clause for $200 in the event that Brain Train breached, and assuming Brain Train admits to a breach would that cause be upheld in court No, the amount is too low for the type of harm she suffered Natasha had a 5-year-old son, Klaus, who had been diagnosed by his pediatric psychiatrist with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) The physician tried multiple different medications and dosages with varying results to help Klaus Some would help for a while but then stop working some would not help at all. Frustrated after a year of medication trials, Natasha came across an advertisement for a new center called Brain Train that promised to help children with ADHD without the use of medications. It was advertised as a privately owned mental exercise center" that didn't require a physician's referral and did not employ medical staff. Also among the advertising material was the story about the founder, John Gadeaux, who overcame his own ADHD without doctors or prescriptions and how he was bringing his technique to the world. Natasha made an appointment with the center to get more information While there. Natasha met with Mina, the director of the center. Mina provided numerous pamphlets touting the almost 100 percent "curerate of their method. She even provided Natasha with what looked like a clinical study conducted by six independent doctors showing a 100 percent success rate for 10 children completing the program Mina said that they believed ADHD was merely a failure of the brain to balance the primitive reflexes with which we are all born. She discussed how Brain Train would test Klaus for these reflexes at the beginning of the program and again at the end of the 12-week program, and without a doube" Natasha would see improvement. Mina also told Natasha that the program consisted of a series of exercises that would be conducted at the center and that Natasha would need to conduct at home. The exercises X Yes, it was mutually agreed upon by both parties No, in this case, actual damages can be easily determined Yes, it is reasonable and fair In this case, what if anything) could Natasha have done to mitigate her Business Case: Contracts Apply It: Contracts Total points: 2/5 Attempts left: 1 In this case, what if anything) could Natasha have done to mitigate her monetary damages after paying for the program? X She could have continued to seek the right medication for Klaus She could have insisted more strongly on a refund Natasha had a 5-year old son, Klaus, who had been diagnosed by his pediatric psychiatrist with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The physician tried multiple different medications and dosages with varying results to help Klaus. Some would help for a while but then stop working some would not help at all. Frustrated after a year of medication trials, Natasha came across an advertisement for a new center called Brain Train that promised to help children with ADHD without the use of medications. It was advertised as a privately owned "mental exercise center" that didn't require a physician's referral and did not employ medical staff. Also among the advertising material was the story about the founder, John Gadeaux, who overcame his own ADHD without doctors or prescriptions and how he was bringing his technique to the world. Natasha made an appointment with the center to get more information While there, Natasha met with Mina, the director of the center. Mina provided numerous pamphlets touting the almost 100 percent "curerate of their method. She even provided Natasha with what looked like a clinical study conducted by six independent doctors showing a 100 percent success rate for 10 children completing the program Mina said that they believed ADHD was merely a failure of the brain to balance the primitive reflexes" with which we are all born. She discussed how Brain Train would test Klaus for these reflexes at the beginning of the program and again at the end of the 12-week program, and without a doubt" Natasha would see improvement. Mina also told Natasha that the program consisted of a series of exercises that would be conducted at the center and that Natasha would need to conduct at home. The exercises She could have taken Klaus to another program Nothing Try Again