Bighorn sheep are beautiful wild animals found throughout thewestern United States. Let x be the age of a bighorn sheep(in years), and let y be the mortality rate (percent thatdie) for this age group. For example, x = 1, y =14 means that 14% of the bighorn sheep between 1 and 2 years olddied. A random sample of Arizona bighorn sheep gave the followinginformation:
x | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
y | 12.8 | 20.9 | 14.4 | 19.6 | 20.0 |
Σx = 15; Σy = 87.7; Σx2 =55; Σy2 = 1592.17; Σxy = 276.2
(a) Draw a scatter diagram.
(b) Find the equation of the least-squares line. (Round youranswers to two decimal places.)
(c) Find r. Find the coefficient of determinationr2. (Round your answers to three decimalplaces.)
Explain what these measures mean in the context of the problem.
The correlation coefficient r measures the strength ofthe linear relationship between a bighorn sheep's age and themortality rate. The coefficient of determinationr2 measures the explained variation inmortality rate by the corresponding variation in age of a bighornsheep.
The coefficient of determination r measures thestrength of the linear relationship between a bighorn sheep's ageand the mortality rate. The correlation coefficientr2 measures the explained variation inmortality rate by the corresponding variation in age of a bighornsheep. Â
Both the correlation coefficient r and coefficient ofdetermination r2 measure the strength of thelinear relationship between a bighorn sheep's age and the mortalityrate.
The correlation coefficient r2 measures thestrength of the linear relationship between a bighorn sheep's ageand the mortality rate. The coefficient of determination rmeasures the explained variation in mortality rate by thecorresponding variation in age of a bighorn sheep.
(d) Test the claim that the population correlation coefficient ispositive at the 1% level of significance. (Round your teststatistic to three decimal places.)
t =
Find or estimate the P-value of the test statistic.
P-value > 0.250
0.125 < P-value < 0.250Â Â Â
0.100 < P-value < 0.125
0.075 < P-value < 0.100
0.050 < P-value < 0.075
0.025 < P-value < 0.050
0.010 < P-value < 0.025
0.005 < P-value < 0.010
0.0005 < P-value < 0.005
P-value < 0.0005
Conclusion
Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence thatÏ > 0.
Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence thatÏ > 0.  Â
Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidencethat Ï > 0.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficientevidence that Ï > 0.
(e) Given the result from part (c), is it practical to findestimates of y for a given x value based on theleast-squares line model? Explain.
Given the lack of significance of r, prediction fromthe least-squares model might be misleading.
Given the significance of r, prediction from theleast-squares model is practical. Â
Given the significance of r, prediction from theleast-squares model might be misleading.
Given the lack of significance of r, prediction fromthe least-squares model is practical.