1. Discuss the concept of governmental immunity, the Federal Tort Claims Act and the concept of...

80.2K

Verified Solution

Question

General Management

1. Discuss the concept of governmental immunity, the FederalTort Claims Act and the concept of discretionary function. Explainthe discretionary function exception to the Act in light of theLingua v. United States decision.

Answer & Explanation Solved by verified expert

4.1 Ratings (514 Votes)

Congress enacted the Federal Tort claim Act 28 united states of americaC 1346 a waiver of sovereign immunity to provide therapies to participants harmed through executive negligence for the duration of this article all statutory references are to Title 28 of the united states Code As a remedial statute the FTCA is to be construed liberally and its exceptions must be read narrowly OToole v United states of america ninth Cir 2002 295 F3d 1029 1037 section 1346b1 authorizes civil movements in opposition to the government for damages for damage or loss of property or personal harm or dying brought on by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any worker of the federal government even as appearing within the scope of his office or employment beneath occasions the place the united states if a personal character can be in charge to the claimant in keeping with the legislation of the place where the act or omission befell Section 2674 places the federal government in the identical function as a exclusive man or woman for functions of tort liability It says the US Might be dependable respecting the provisions of this title relating to tort claims in the same method and to the identical extent as a confidential individual under like occasions The principal exceptions to the governments waiver of sovereign immunity are in section 2680 Some of the fashioned is the discretionary function exception part 2680a This statute exempts the government from legal responsibility for any declare Established upon the pastime or performance or the failure to undertaking or participate in a discretionary operate or responsibility on the a part of a federal company or an employee of the federal government whether or not the discretion worried be abused Discretionary function immunity is an affirmative security with the burden of proof upon the government to show that it used to be exercising a discretionary function when it acted or failed to behave Discretionary function immunity The rationale of the discretionary function immunity is to avoid putting courts in the function of 2ndguessing the federal governments social fiscal and political selections it isnt to shield the government from liability for violating its own defense mandates In united states v SA Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense Varig airways 1984 467 US 797 104 SCt 2755 two airways and households of passengers who died in crashes sued the USA claiming that the Federal Aviation Administration was negligent in issuing a protection certificate for the planes that crashed The airline and passengers claimed that the apparatus did not satisfy relevant protection regulations and therefore the FAA was once negligent in issuing a supplemental safety certificate for an plane Varig airways explained that Congress enacted a multistep certification approach to watch the aviation enterprise compliance with the great set of security laws that delineate the security standards for industrial aircraft The FAA have to approve a brand new plane common design assessment drawings make inspections monitor checks be trained experiment information authorize production of aircraft and investigate whether the manufacturer can preserve pleasant manipulate With so much responsibility and only 400 engineers to habits the investigations and studies and the impossibility of reviewing the hundreds and hundreds of drawings and information that manufacturers have to post the FAA developed a procedure of compliance overview that entails spot checking the companys work Turning to the reason of the discretionary function exception Varig airways cautioned that this exception was designed to restrict courts from 2dguessing policymakers First it is the nature of the conduct as an alternative than the status of the actor that governs whether or not the discretionary function exception applies in a given case As a result the basic inquiry involving the appliance of the discretionary operate exception is whether or not the challenged acts of a government worker something his or her rank are of the nature and firstclass that Congress meant to look after from tort legal responsibility Second some thing else the discretionary function exception may incorporate it it appears that evidently used to be meant to embody the discretionary acts of the federal government performing in its role as a regulator of the behavior of exclusive members This emphasis upon safety for regulatory pursuits suggests an underlying basis for the inclusion of an exception for discretionary capabilities within the Act Congress wished to restrict judicial 2ndguessing of legislative and administrative selections grounded in social financial and political policy by means of the medium of an action in tort The See Answer

Get Answers to Unlimited Questions

Join us to gain access to millions of questions and expert answers. Enjoy exclusive benefits tailored just for you!

Membership Benefits:

Unlimited Question Access with detailed Answers
Zin AI - 3 Million Words
10 Dall-E 3 Images
20 Plot Generations
Conversation with Dialogue Memory
No Ads, Ever!
Access to Our Best AI Platform: Flex AI - Your personal assistant for all your inquiries!

Become a Member